Web Applications
Authentication bypass, session hijacking, business-logic exploitation, SQL injection, XSS, SSRF, IDOR, and remote code execution testing against OWASP Top 10 and ASVS Level 2 criteria.
Manual, attacker-simulated exploitation — not scanner output repackaged as findings. Our senior testers chain low-severity issues into real business impact, testing the logic flaws, trust relationships, and privilege paths that automated tools structurally miss.
01 — Recon
$ nmap -sV target.com
→ 22 services. 3 public-facing apps.
02 — Initial Access
$ exploit CVE-2024-xxxx
→ Shell obtained on web-01.
03 — Escalation
$ kerberoast --domain corp.local
→ Service account hash cracked.
04 — Lateral
$ pivot web-01 → dc-01
→ Domain Controller reached.
05 — Impact
$ dump --ntds --proof
→ Domain Admin. Full compromise.
$
Aligned to the standards your auditors expect
// What's Included
Our penetration testing services are structured around four phases that mirror how a real adversary operates: gather intelligence, find entry points, exploit and chain weaknesses, and document everything with evidence an engineering team can act on immediately.
// Scope
Our penetration testing services scale from a single application to your entire infrastructure. Most engagements begin with the assets closest to sensitive data or revenue-critical operations, then expand scope in subsequent cycles.
Authentication bypass, session hijacking, business-logic exploitation, SQL injection, XSS, SSRF, IDOR, and remote code execution testing against OWASP Top 10 and ASVS Level 2 criteria.
BOLA, broken function-level authorization, mass assignment, injection through query parameters, rate-limit bypass, and data exposure mapped to OWASP API Security Top 10.
Android and iOS binary analysis, insecure local storage, certificate pinning bypass, runtime manipulation, inter-process communication flaws, and API-layer testing aligned to OWASP MASVS.
AWS, Azure, and GCP penetration testing: IAM privilege escalation, storage bucket enumeration, metadata service exploitation, serverless function abuse, and cross-account trust misconfigurations.
Internal network penetration testing covering Active Directory enumeration, Kerberoasting, AS-REP roasting, credential relay attacks, lateral movement, and domain privilege escalation paths.
On-site wireless penetration testing (WPA2/WPA3 assessment, rogue AP detection, evil twin attacks) and physical security testing including tailgating, badge cloning, and USB drop simulations when in scope.
// Attack Scenarios
Real attackers do not follow scanner checklists. They chain weaknesses, pivot between systems, and exploit trust relationships. Our penetration testing services replicate these multi-step attack paths to show you what an adversary can actually achieve against your environment.
Scenario 01 / 06
We simulate an external attacker with no prior access attempting to breach your internet-facing perimeter. This includes port scanning, service enumeration, vulnerability exploitation on exposed services, web application attacks, and attempts to pivot from a public-facing foothold into internal systems. The objective is to determine whether an outsider can gain initial access and how far they can reach from that entry point.
How we test it
Full external attack-surface mapping using passive OSINT and active enumeration, followed by targeted exploitation of identified services, web applications, and VPN/remote-access endpoints.
Once initial access is obtained, we attempt to escalate privileges from a low-level user to administrator or root. This involves exploiting misconfigurations in sudo rules, SUID binaries, scheduled tasks, service accounts with excessive permissions, and kernel or OS-level vulnerabilities. On Windows systems, we test for unquoted service paths, DLL hijacking, and token impersonation opportunities.
How we test it
Systematic enumeration of local privilege escalation vectors on each compromised host, combined with automated tooling (LinPEAS, WinPEAS, BloodHound) and manual verification of each escalation path.
Active Directory is the backbone of most enterprise networks, and its compromise typically means full domain control. We test for Kerberoasting, AS-REP roasting, unconstrained delegation abuse, credential relay attacks (NTLM relay, PetitPotam), GPO abuse, and DCSync. We map every privilege escalation path from a standard domain user to Domain Admin using BloodHound analysis.
How we test it
BloodHound enumeration of AD trust relationships, manual Kerberos ticket analysis, credential relay attempts, and exploitation of identified escalation paths from standard user to Domain Admin.
In cloud-native environments, the attack surface shifts to IAM policies, instance metadata services, serverless function configurations, and cross-account trust relationships. We test for SSRF-to-IMDS credential extraction, overly permissive IAM roles, publicly exposed storage buckets with sensitive data, and misconfigured cross-account trust policies that allow unauthorized access from external accounts.
How we test it
Cloud-specific enumeration using Pacu (AWS), ScoutSuite, and manual IAM policy analysis. SSRF testing against metadata endpoints, storage enumeration, and privilege escalation through misconfigured roles and policies.
APIs often expose more functionality than intended. We chain together IDOR vulnerabilities, broken function-level authorization, mass assignment flaws, and injection points across multiple API endpoints to demonstrate realistic attack paths. A single low-severity information disclosure on one endpoint can be combined with a mass-assignment flaw on another to achieve full account takeover or data exfiltration.
How we test it
Full API endpoint enumeration, multi-role authorization matrix testing, parameter fuzzing, and systematic chaining of individual findings into multi-step exploitation paths.
Technical controls mean little if an employee can be convinced to hand over credentials or execute a malicious payload. We design and execute targeted phishing campaigns using realistic pretexts based on OSINT gathered during reconnaissance. This includes credential-harvesting pages, payload delivery via email attachments, and vishing (voice phishing) calls where scope permits.
How we test it
Custom phishing infrastructure with tracking, realistic pretext development based on OSINT, and detailed reporting on click rates, credential submissions, and payload execution rates.
0%
Manual testing coverage per engagement
0+
Avg. exploitable findings per engagement
0h
Critical-finding escalation time
0%
Findings retested at no cost
// Methodology
Five phases. PTES and NIST SP 800-115 aligned. From scoping to signed closure report — every step documented, every finding retested.
#!/bin/bash — pentest-engagement
$ scope --rules-of-engagement --test-window
→ Targets defined. Black/grey/white box agreed.
✓ Engagement scoped — Week 0
$ recon --osint --enum --fingerprint
→ External surface mapped. 47 services. 3 entry points.
✓ Attack surface inventory — Week 1
$ exploit --chain --pivot --escalate
✗ Initial access → lateral movement → Domain Admin.
✓ Exploitation complete — Week 1-2
$ post-exploit --persist --exfil --impact
✗ Data exfil validated. Persistence established.
✓ Impact documented — Week 2
$ report --cvss4 --attack-paths --retest
→ 12 findings. Attack chain diagrams. Walkthrough done.
✓ Closure report after retest — Week 3
$
Define scope, objectives, testing windows, communication protocols, and rules of engagement. Identify in-scope targets, out-of-scope systems, constraints (no DoS, no production data modification). Obtain formal authorization. Agree on black-box, grey-box, or white-box approach and establish emergency contact procedures.
Passive and active intelligence gathering: OSINT collection, subdomain enumeration, technology fingerprinting, port and service scanning, credential breach-database searches. Map the full external and internal attack surface before any exploitation begins.
Manual exploitation using custom payloads and established tooling. Bypass security controls, escalate privileges, and pivot to additional systems. Chain low-severity issues into high-impact attack paths that demonstrate real business risk — from initial foothold to lateral movement to domain-level access.
Assess what an attacker could achieve from each compromised position: credential harvesting, data exfiltration proof, persistence mechanisms, and potential for domain-wide compromise. Document the full attack chain from initial entry to maximum achievable impact.
Prioritized report with CVSS 4.0 scores, full proof-of-concept evidence, attack-chain diagrams, and developer-ready remediation guidance. Live walkthrough with your engineering team. Free retest of every finding once fixed. Signed closure report for auditors and customers.
// Deliverables
Every penetration testing engagement produces a complete set of deliverables designed for three audiences: engineers who need to fix the issues, leadership who needs to understand the risk, and auditors who need formal evidence of due diligence.
A concise overview of overall risk posture, key findings, and business impact written for non-technical stakeholders and board-level reporting.
Every exploited vulnerability documented with CVSS 4.0 scoring, full proof-of-concept evidence, HTTP request/response captures, screenshots, and step-by-step reproduction instructions.
Visual maps of every multi-step attack path exploited during the engagement, showing how individual weaknesses were chained to achieve broader compromise.
Developer-ready fix guidance for every finding, with specific code-level or configuration-level recommendations mapped to OWASP, CWE, and MITRE ATT&CK references.
Once findings are remediated, we retest every issue at no extra cost and deliver a signed closure report confirming fix status, ready for auditors, regulators, and enterprise customers.
Five deliverables. One engagement. Everything your team and your auditors need.
Request a sample report// Why CipherTrivia
There are meaningful differences between a penetration test that produces actionable results and one that repackages scanner output. Here is what sets our penetration testing services apart.
Every engagement is led by experienced penetration testers who manually validate every finding. No scanner-only reports. No unvalidated output passed off as testing.
We chain individual vulnerabilities into realistic multi-step attack paths to demonstrate actual business impact, not just theoretical risk ratings on isolated issues.
If a finding is in your report, it has been exploited and confirmed. Your engineering team spends time remediating real vulnerabilities, not triaging scanner noise.
Reports map directly to ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR evidence requirements. No rework needed before your next audit cycle.
// Proof of Work
Penetration Test · Banking & Fintech
A regional bank required a full penetration test of its customer-facing API gateway ahead of a production launch. Our testers identified 9 exploitable issues, including a critical broken access control flaw that allowed cross-account data access. All findings were remediated and retested within a 3-week deadline.
Read case study// FAQ
Vulnerability scanning is automated: a tool checks your systems against a database of known weaknesses and produces a list. Penetration testing goes further. A human tester takes those findings, chains them together, and attempts real exploitation to determine what is actually exploitable in your specific environment. Scanners report possibilities; penetration testers confirm realities. A vulnerability scan might flag an open port, but a penetration test will determine whether that port can be leveraged to gain unauthorized access to internal systems, escalate privileges, or exfiltrate data.
At minimum, once per year and after any significant infrastructure or application change. Compliance frameworks such as PCI DSS require annual penetration tests explicitly. Organizations with continuous deployment pipelines, frequent feature releases, or high-risk data (financial, healthcare, PII) benefit from quarterly or semi-annual testing cycles. We also recommend an ad-hoc test before any major product launch, merger-related system integration, or cloud migration.
Our rules of engagement are defined before any testing begins. We agree on testing windows, rate limits, and explicitly excluded actions such as denial-of-service or destructive write operations. Where possible, testing runs against staging environments. When production testing is required, we coordinate timing with your operations team, use throttled techniques, and maintain a direct communication channel throughout the engagement so any concern can be addressed immediately.
Our penetration testing methodology is aligned to PTES (Penetration Testing Execution Standard) and NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment). Findings are scored using CVSS 4.0 and mapped to OWASP Top 10, OWASP API Security Top 10, CWE, and MITRE ATT&CK where applicable. Reports are structured to satisfy evidence requirements for ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR audits.
Yes. Every penetration testing engagement includes one full retest cycle at no additional cost. Once your engineering team has remediated the findings, we re-verify each issue individually and issue a signed closure report confirming the fix status. This closure report is the document most auditors and enterprise customers request as evidence that identified risks have been addressed.
Tell us about your application, API, cloud, or network environment and we will scope a penetration testing engagement that fits your timeline, compliance requirements, and budget.